Redistricting in Sandoval County

Redistricting Meeting September 28, 2011

By Patricia Morlen

 

Below are a few thoughts on the plans being proposed during the Redistricting Public Workshop on Wednesday September 28th.  At this meeting we learned about a new plan, designated  A1.

The presentation of the plans was conducted by Mike Sharp, a VP for Research & Polling, who were contracted to do the numbers for the county.  Mr. Sharp started his presentation with a short, but clear explanation of the law(s) governing redistricting.  He explained what the law states is REQUIRED and what is ALLOWED and NOT ALLOWED within the process.  He then started with a map of the county as it exists, with labels to express how far off some of the districts are from being equal in population.  He then explained how each of the plans being presented meet the REQUIRED criteria, and some of the ALLOWED criteria.  They are simply variations in shifting geographic boundaries of districts along precinct lines.  No precincts were split in any plan.  No plan is seen as perfect, each having strengths and weaknesses. What is up to individuals and ultimately the commission is, given personal (could be read political but cannot be discussed as such) preferences,  to select the plan most preferred.

County Commissioner District Redistricting Plans

Plan A is a plan of least change.  The biggest thing it does is move Santa Anna Pueblo out of District 5 into District 1. This plan would most ensure the status quo in the makeup of the County Commissioners.

 

Plan A1 is very similar to Plan A except that it moves District 1 up to Pena Blanca and grabs the Santo Domingo Pueblo and Cochiti Lake on the way. This plan came about because about a year ago some people in Pena Blanca expressed that they did not want to be in District 5.  They say that their County Commissioner has never visited them.  So 49 people or so petitioned to get this plan drawn up, my humble opinion is that if Commissioner Madalena is not doing his job and addressing his constituents they should band together and vote him out.  Instead they choose to continue to let him remain in office and petition to be placed somewhere else. If Government officials don’t do their job they need to be voted out; this plan would cause much more shifting of County Commission District boundary lines, and significantly changes the community makeup of District 1.

 

Plan B The biggest change in this plan is that District 5 will take a larger portion of the Enchanted Hills area in Rio Rancho.

 

Plan C is a very interesting plan. Plan C squarely places Districts 2, 3, and 4 in Rio Rancho thus giving Rio Rancho three seats on the Commission and making them a community of interest. It takes Corrales out of District 2 and places it in District 1, making Placitas, Bernalillo, and Corrales an agricultural community of interest. District 5 remains a Native American District, ensuring that the Native Americans will remain an undiluted community of interest with a voice on the County Commission.

 

Plan D This plan keeps Corrales in District 2, Condenses District 3 and moves District 1 further into Enchanted Hills Area along NM550.

 

Plan E This plan brings Corrales, Placitas and a small portion of Rio Rancho into District 2. It brings Santa Anna into District 1, and moves District 1 further into Enchanted Hills along NM 550. It also appears to move District 5 further into Rio Rancho.

 

After hearing Commissioner Lucero and Commissioner Leonard speak at the meeting, expressing their feelings on re-districting;  I feel that the choice for them will be either Plan A or Plan A1. This basically keeps the status quo. If Commissioner Madelena may prefer Plan A1, it would allow the disgruntled people in Pena Blanca to move out of his District. Is it in the best interest of District 1 to take in Pena Blanca?   This may be hard to say.  District 1 would end up with La Madera to the East, a 100mile round trip; and Pena Blanca to the Northwest, a 60 mile trip to them. Does that equate to good representation? Representation is only as good as the Commissioner you elect. If you like the way you are represented on the County Commission, then plans A or A1 would be your plans. If you want a change then look at Plan C or E. If Placitas and Corrales combine your voice possibly would be stronger and harder to ignore.

 

These plans will be discussed at the next County Commissioners Meeting, which should be on Oct. 6th but has not been officially announced.  At this time we also may see some new plans, if the Commissioners decide they want to change anything. Nothing is set in stone until the vote is taken. I would encourage you to come and express your opinion on the plans. You will have to live with the outcome for the next ten years.

 

You can look at the different Plans by going to the County Website at www.sandovalcounty.com

Posted in Re-Districting | 4 Comments

Update on the I-25/US 550 Interchange

As many of you have heard, the interchange at I-25 and US 550 is scheduled for reconstruction. The project is currently in the Environmental Assessment phase and numerous interchange configurations have been examined. The preferred alternative is a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) that is similar in configuration to the interchange at Louisiana Boulevard and I-40. This interchange will have signalized intersections for left turns entering and exiting the freeway, thus eliminating the need to cross conflicting traffic. The project will also include improvements to US 550 from the interchange to NM 313 and will modify a portion of NM 165 just east of the interchange. The purpose of the proposed project is to reduce congestion within the interchange and on US 550 within the project boundaries, improve access to businesses, and improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Construction is programmed to begin in 2013.

For those interested, a public hearing for the proposed reconstruction of the I-25/US 550 Interchange will take place on:

Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm
Bernalillo High School Gym, 250 Isidro Sanchez Road, Bernalillo, NM 87004

The public hearing will provide information about the project and the environmental assessment (EA) and will also provide an opportunity for the public to comment on the proposed project and the planned measures to mitigate impacts to environmental and cultural resources. Comments specific to proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities are also requested.

Project displays, information, and project representatives will be available starting at 6:00 pm. A presentation will start at 6:30 followed by a formal public comment period. A court reporter will be available during the comment period to record public comments.

The EA is available for review online at www.i25us550.com.

Posted in I-25/US 550 Interchange | 1 Comment