I 25/Rt. 550/Rt. 165 Construction

I 25/RT. 550/165 INTERCHANGE

UPDATE

Eastern Sandoval Citizens Association (ES-CA) Directors, Bob Gorrell, Jerry Saxton and Chris Daul met with NM Department of Transportation officials on January 30, 2014, to discuss the I 25/Rt. 550/165 interchange project, and specifically, the ramp design from I 25 northbound to Rt. 165 eastbound.

DOT officials acknowledged that the original plans had been changed, which eliminated an acceleration lane for traffic entering Rt. 165 eastbound. The new design has raised complaints from numerous Placitas residents, concerning the visibility of oncoming traffic heading eastbound from the Bernalillo area on Rt. 165. DOT officials said that once the final lane pattern is completed, the visibility would improve, since the existing poles, holding up the light signals, would be removed, temporary signage would be removed, and the location of vehicles that are stacking on the off ramp in order to turn left onto Rt. 165 will be shifted farther to the west.

As we know, the new configuration became operational on February 2. DOT District Three Engineer, Timothy Parker, stated that if there are any problems with the ramp, after completion of the new traffic configuration, DOT will meet with us again to determine how to address the issue. We would like to hear from residents as to whether the new configuration is still a problem or if it is now better.

Also, DOT officials said that the construction company, heading the project, is being fined in excess of $8,500.00 per day for non-compliance of their contract with the State. DOT understands the frustration Placitas residents, and others, are having with the construction project and indicated that they will work with us to alleviate any problems that remain after completion.

ES-CA will continue to work to insure that this project is completed as soon as possible and will insure that Placitans’ concerns are addressed.

Posted in I-25/US 550 Interchange | 11 Comments

2014 Placitas Communities Zoning Update

Currently, there are three open zoning violations that all relate to gravel quarries. The beauty of this area has attracted many people who have built moderate and high end rural homes, and the gravel, used mostly in the urban areas for landscape, roads and concrete, has attracted the gravel mines. There is an expected tension between the beauty of the area and its abundant stone and gravel. The regulation of that tension for the protection of property rights, investments, and peaceful ownership for our unincorporated communities falls under the Sandoval County Zoning regulations. Prior to enactment of the County regulations, the Town of Bernalillo / Sandoval County Extra-Territorial Zoning (ETZ) Commission regulated most areas of Placitas excluding the Village. The last Chairman of the ETZ which disbanded in 1995 was Tom Swisstack, presently Mayor of Rio Rancho. On a per household basis, Placitans pay some of the highest per capita property taxes in the county. There are no severance taxes for gravel extraction. If you would like to see gravel mining and the associated truck traffic double or triple, do not read any further.

The first of the three open violations relates to the old McIlhaney Gravel Mine. It was partially reclaimed, or restored wherein grades are re-shaped to emulate the surrounding area and then seeded. This reclamation occurred about 1999. As this occurred four years after the ETZ, page 19 item 5 of the “Extra-Territorial Zoning Ordinance”, was never enforced. “In the event that a use authorized as an S-U Zone is permanently discontinued, the S-U Zone may be cancelled and removed from the Zoning Map under the provisions for an amendment to this Ordinance. That area delineated by such discontinued S-U zone shall be rezoned to the prevailing surrounding zone as determined by the Authority following recommendation by the Commission.”

On October 21, 2010, Sandoval County repealed the ETZ Ordinance. Then on November 18, 2010 Sandoval County violated several of its own ordinances when it brought the long discontinued S-U Sand/Gravel special use, originally granted by the ETZ, into the Sandoval County Zoning Map with Ordinance 10-11-18.7B3. The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to protect property rights by providing clear expectations. Special Use is spot zoning and is not a right conferred upon a governing body or property owner, but is allowed through due process if enabling zoning ordinance will allow:

Section 16, Non-conformities, Abandonment. “Whenever a nonconforming use has been discontinued or abandoned for a period of one year or more, such use shall not thereafter be reestablished, and any future use must be in conformance with the provisions of this Ordinance.”

Section 10, A., Intent., SU Special-Use District – “… The County Board may not grant a Zone Map Amendment for establishment of a Special Use District unless satisfactory provisions have been made:
1. To assure the compatibility of property uses shall be maintained in the general area.
2. To preserve the integrity and character of the area …
[same as the Placitas Area Plan language].

Section 10, C., Removal of Zones., SU Special-Use District, – “In the event that a use authorized as a Special Use District is permanently discontinued … shall be restored to the prevailing zone district …”. In fact “discontinued” means for an extraction site, no extraction by the operator has occurred for more than 6 months.”

Per the Sandoval Zoning Ordinance, this property should have reverted to the zoning of adjoining properties and the overlay zoning of the Placitas Area Plan. Continuing this spot zoning violates both the intent and the letter of the zoning ordinance and threatens properties nearby. If you want to see this property, it is south of 165 and the next properties, just south of the illegal Fisher gravel mine, and just north of the Bernalillo water tank reservoir. This property is owned by the Sandia Tribe, but it’s not a part of the sovereign tribal lands. Sandia has proven itself over time to be an exceptionally good steward of the land, but it also allowed decades of gravel mining to occur between Bernalillo and the Pueblo before requiring that the land be reclaimed.

The next violator is Fisher. It is not happenstance that these properties are neighbors. There is plenty of gravel up and down the Rio Grande corridor, and the Placitas Area just happens to be closer to Albuquerque than a lot of other mines. The short story on Fisher is that they feigned a “Terrain Management” re-grading of their property for future commercial lots instead of going through the process for an S-U (special use) Sand and Gravel permit. ES-CA and the community took the Sandoval County Commission to task on this violation when the asphalt equipment moved on site. The county sent a compliance letter to Fisher on January 27, 2012 and in accordance with Section 15(F) of the Zoning Ordinance, they were to remove all equipment and stock piles of materials. The equipment and material remain on the site and the original faux use agreement expired in December of last year.

The last site is not unlike Fisher in thumbing their nose at the Sandoval County Government and its citizens. Lafarge came in on the coat tails of another mining operation approved by the late ETZ. As this mine has been in continuous use and not abandoned or use discontinued, the County was obligated to bring the ETZ use in under Section 10 (1), J., SU Sand and Gravel Mining, Existing Current Uses / Grandfather Clause. Lafarge does not interpret things the same as the County and has expanded its mine past the ETZ approval and do not think they should have to follow the parts of the ordinance that require application and process described earlier for S-U Sand and Gravel. There is a lot more to be said about this property and the neighbors near this property will tell the rest of this story.

Posted in Zoning and Land Use | Tagged , , | 9 Comments

I-25/US 550 Interchange and Placitas Traffic Safety

The I-25/US 550 Bridge Reconstruction just keeps going and going, but wait there’s more… or less. The old intersection had two eastbound lanes to Placitas. When you exited from northbound I-25 to head east at 165, you had to crane your neck around to see if you could merge. Some of you might remember the DOT public presentation in November of 2011 where the plan we were to agree upon included a new merge acceleration lane? I sure do and the reasoning. It would be safer. All of us had seen both rear-end and side-swipe collisions at that intersection. The merge lane was needed and we agreed.

You have probably noticed there is no merge lane. In fact, the angle of the reconstructed intersection due to aligning 165 further south is even more acute. Now you really have to crane your neck to merge and I have observed that the large trucks have to stick their heads out of the window to see oncoming traffic. The new intersection is worse than before. What happened? As it turns out the merge lane was removed to better accommodate gravel trucks jockeying over to the northbound frontage road. The logic of this decision is perplexing.

On January 30th,2014 ES-CA representatives met with DOT District 3 Engineer Tim Parker at the I-25 / 550 intersection. ES-CA had the week earlier sent a letter on the safety concern to Mr. Parker, our county Fire Chief and Sheriff, and to our state and federal representatives (link to letter below). At the meeting Mr. Parker recognized our concern, but wished to complete the project without the merge lane and see how it worked. Construction is expected to be complete in 60 days and lets hope no one is hurt in the meantime. ES-CA asked in the meantime that DOT investigate restricting heavy trucks over 2 tons from the frontage roads between 7- 9 AM and 4 – 6 PM to lessen the congestion. Mr. Parker said he would investigate. ES-CA believe that reducing the number of trucks during peak commute times would benefit both the trucks and the passenger cars. Similarly, adding back the merge lane would increase the traffic safety for both our community and the large trucks.

January 21 letter to DOT: DOT Letter 21Jan2014

Posted in I-25/US 550 Interchange | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

ES-CA General Meeting

 

 

The Eastern Sandoval Citizens Association (ES-CA) held a general meeting on Saturday, November 2, 2013, at the Placitas Community Center.  The first issue noted was that our property tax bills had been reduced, due to a reduction in the ESCAFCA tax levy.  Thanks go to all of the volunteers and members of ES-CA who worked hard to have Placitas removed from the ESCAFCA region.  This matter exemplifies exactly what ES-CA does – work to keep Placitans informed and to advocate for their best interests.

 

The major topic of discussion was the reactivation and increase in volume use of the pipelines that run through Placitas.  To date, the Federal Government and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) have refused to adequately address the risks and safety issues that they are required to address.  ES-CA has been working with La Placitas Association (LPA) to force the Government to conduct the necessary studies.  These pipelines run close to the school, the community center, and a number of residences.  The oldest pipe was laid in 1956.  Leaks could result in groundwater contamination and even explosions and fire.  ES-CA is looking for volunteers to join a task force that will work with the community to press our concerns and have the Federal Government do what is necessary to examine the risks associated with the pipelines.  If you are interested in being a part of the task force, please contact us at                         info@es-ca.org

 

One ongoing issue is the BLM Resource Management Plan (RMP), which will govern the use of the tracts of land that BLM owns in and around Placitas.  One of the options that BLM is considering is opening this land to mining.  These areas include the Buffalo tract which borders Placitas to the north, part of which BLM has identified for possible gravel mining; a 195 acre tract that is surrounded by development; and the Crest of Montezuma.  ES-CA has already submitted comments to the BLM and is working with our Federal officials to remove the mining recommendations.  Dealing with the Federal Government is not an easy task.  Anyone who wants to help in this matter is encouraged to contact us at info@es-ca.org

 

Another ongoing issue is the LaFarge mining operations.  At the insistence of ES-CA, homeowner associations and others, Sandoval County has issued documents demanding that LaFarge abide by the 1988 Noncompliance agreement.  Yet, LaFarge has continued to violate that agreement and has expanded its operations in ways that are not allowed.  ES-CA will be meeting again with County officials to demand that the County duly exercise its authority and take whatever action is necessary to enforce its prior zoning agreement with LaFarge.  It was ES-CA’s vigilance that drove the County to enforce its regulations against the Fisher Sand and Gravel operations, and stop an illegal asphalt plant from beginning operations.  ES-CA is using that same vigilance in the LaFarge matter to insure that illegal operations do not take place.

 

ES-CA is continuing to expand its Watchdog program, which involves volunteers attending local meetings to report on what actions different entities may be taking that have an impact upon Placitas.  Volunteers attend meetings of the Sandoval County Commission, the County Planning and Zoning Committee, the Bernalillo Town Council, the Bernalillo Planning and Zoning Commission and other meetings.  If you are interested in becoming a Watchdog, please contact Scott Stevens at info@es-ca.org

 

Please visit the ES-CA website at es-ca.org and check out the articles in the Forum.  Also, if you would like to join ES-CA, you can do so online.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

US 550/I-25 Project Update

The US 550/I-25 project completion has been delayed until late December. The original completion date was scheduled for the first week of November. The contractor, FNF Construction, has cited numerous reasons for the delays, including utility conflicts and difficulties with traffic control and phasing. They are currently negotiating with the NMDOT the amount of fines that will be levied against them because of the delayed completion.

Posted in I-25/US 550 Interchange | Leave a comment

Results of ES-CA Algodones Bar and Free Range Horses Survey

Here are the results of the ES-CA Survey conducted from 7-11-2013 to 7-15-2013.  60 members responded to the Survey:

Question 1, Application for Algodones Bar to be Open Until 2 AM: Would you support or oppose the application to extend the hours of operation of the proposed establishment from 9 pm to 2 am?

Response          Count            Percent

Oppose              45                 75%

Support              11                 18%

No Opinion          4                    6%

Question 2, Administering Contraception to Placitas Free Ranging Horses: Would you support or oppose WHOA’s plan to administer contraception to the free ranging horses in Placitas?

Response            Count          Percent

Support                51                85%

Oppose                8                  13%

No Opinion           1                    1%

 

 

Posted in Horses, Zoning and Land Use | Leave a comment

Proposed Bar and Restaurant in Algodones

Proposed Bar and Restaurant in Algodones

Owners of a property in Algodones, right off the I-25 freeway and to the west of it, have applied to open a store, restaurant and bar there. The area is presently zoned to allow for businesses, including stores, restaurants and bars, but requires that they be closed by 9 PM. The applicant has requested Conditional Use zoning to allow the establishment to be open until 2 AM. The County Planning and Zoning Commission has twice denied this application to extend the hours of operation until 2 AM. The applicant is appealing this denial to the Sandoval County Commission.

That appeal will be heard at the County Commission Meeting on July 18, 2013, at the Sandoval County Administration Building. The meeting begins at 6 PM, though this agenda item will probably be heard later in the meeting.

Algodones, our neighbor to the north, relies on the same Sandoval County Sheriff’s Office for their police protection as does Placitas. Both areas also rely on the same fire and rescue services. In addition, other than the casinos, there are no establishments, that serve liquor, open later than 10 pm in the Placitas, Algodones, Bernalillo area. Statistics show that establishments serving liquor tend to have more need for police, fire and rescue services the later in the evening they are open. We all have to share the same emergency services we have in Sandoval County.

Many Algodones residents have previously objected to the granting of a later closing time for this proposed bar and restaurant. If you wish to make your opinion known on this matter, you may attend the Sandoval County Commission meeting.

Posted in Zoning and Land Use | 1 Comment

Placitas Free Ranging Horses

PLACITAS FREE RANGING HORSES

As we are all aware, there is a situation with free ranging horses in the Placitas area. No one claims ownership of the horses, their exact status has not been officially recognized, and State and County officials have not proposed any plans at this time.

ES-CA is ready to support a viable plan that reflects the position of a consensus of Placitas residents. While a number of plans have been put forward, the only one that seems viable is WHOA’s (Wild Horse Observers Association) proposal to administer contraception to the horses, which addresses only one aspect of the issue. This proposal has not been approved by the controlling governmental agencies.

ES-CA is not a governmental agency. It has no powers to implement any laws, regulations or rules. Its role has been to support community positions that benefit residents, and, to oppose proposed actions that will be harmful to residents. We have called upon our State officials to explain why WHOA’s contraception proposal has not be acted upon: Letter to State Livestock Board.

Posted in Horses | 2 Comments

Horse Meeting

Placitas Wild Horse Meeting 

On June 5, 2013, Sandoval County Commissioner Orlando Lucero convened a meeting of interested parties to discuss the wild horse situation in Placitas.   While there were many participants, only a few ideas were offered.

Both the San Felipe Pueblo and Santa Ana Pueblo disclaimed any ownership of the horses, but San Felipe did say that they have implemented a birth control plan using PZP, but there were no further details.

WHOA commented that they want to remove 30 – 40 horses and want to implement their own PZP plan, but need approval from the NM Livestock Board.

Coronado Water and Soil Conservation stated that the issue is one of soil erosion and drinking water and that the horses are heavily contributing to these problems.  They have requested that the NM Livestock Board have the horses removed.

The BLM stated that the NM Livestock Board has jurisdiction over the horses and, that due to current litigation, they cannot comment further at this time.

The NM Livestock Board admitted that the horses are their responsibility, but offered no plans.

The US Forest Service said that if the horses continue to have a negative impact on USFS land, they will request that the NMLB remove the horses.

No plan was offered as to how to manage the horses in their current location, other than the use of PZP to attempt to control further breeding.  The onus appears to be on the NM Livestock Board, since they are the governmental entity responsible for the horses.

ES-CA will continue to monitor the situation and will work with other entities if there is a practical plan put forward that has the support of required government agencies.  However, it appears as if the NM Livestock Board has to take the lead, since they are the only governmental agency that is responsible for these horses.

 

Posted in Horses | Leave a comment

Sandoval County Fire Department Bans Open Burning

Sandoval County Fire Department Bans Open Burning

Sandoval County, NM, April 30, 2013—The Sandoval County Fire Department has stopped issuing burn permits for the unincorporated areas of Sandoval County.

In recent days, the county fire department has responded to several wild land fires. In addition, several county residents who are accustomed to performing agricultural burns have reported their fires getting out of control.

“We realize that agricultural burning is crucial for certain farming operations,” Sandoval County Fire Chief James Maxon, said. “However, the risk of having a fire get out of control is too great at this point.”

As a result, all open flame sources such as campfires and agricultural burns will be banned until further notice.

“I strongly encourage everyone to be vigilant about fire prevention so a catastrophic fire does not occur,” Chief Maxon added.

In addition to the ban on open burning, the use of fireworks is prohibited in any wild land area in Sandoval County. The use propane grills is still allowed, though smoking outdoor is discouraged.

The fire ban and fireworks restrictions will be enforced by the Sandoval County Fire Marshal and the Sandoval County Sheriff’s Office. Anyone found to be conducting an open burn or using illegal fireworks will be subject to arrest and or fine. County residents should report illegal burning or fireworks to 505-891-7226.

Sandoval County Fire Personnel that encounter an illegal burn should contact law enforcement.

James Maxon

Fire Chief
Sandoval County Fire Department

Office: 505-867-0245

Fax: 505-867-6256

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment