ES-CA BOARD MEETING LOCATION CHANGE

The ES-CA Board has decided to change the location of its monthly meetings from La Puerta Realty office to the Placitas Fire Station. The Station is located at 463 Highway 165. It is just east of the Library. The Board believes that this location is more central to the Placitas community. All ES-CA members and all residents are welcome to attend the meetings. The next meeting is scheduled for Monday, April 6, beginning at 6:30 pm.

Please remember to park in the spaces to the right of the building. Please leave the spaces empty, that are directly in front of the building. These spaces are needed for emergency personnel that would be responding to a 911 call.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

HB 188 “Tabled” by House Energy, Environment, and Natural Resources Committee (HEENC)

By Dick Ulmer – On Monday, the HEENC tabled (read that as “killed”) our proposed amendment to clarify and increase the fine for gravel mining operators who violate zoning laws in our 5 largest New Mexico Counties. It was a vote against local control. Speaking personally, (and as a very disappointed registered Republican) this came down to a party line vote where I can only conclude that the Republicans on this committee agreed that there should be a greater fine ($1000) for those who litter in this state than for unscrupulous businesses who fill the lungs of our citizens with dust, our ears with the noise of crushers and heavy equipment, and our eyes with 100’s of acres of scorched and un-reclaimed dirt ($300 fine). In the testimony given to the HEENC, we drew their attention specifically to this inequity—and to the lack of any state regulations (this state has arguably one of the best mining laws in the U.S.—yet they have decided that gravel mining is not mining and sand and gravel are not minerals—so the state laws do not apply to our issues), which means we have enforce things like noise control and reclamation with local zoning laws. We made it clear (as did the Sandoval County lobbyist) that the current $300 limit that the state places on fines for local zoning violators, makes local zoning ineffective and leaves only the courtroom as a very expensive way to protect our citizens, and that moves at glacial speed while the violations continue.

However, I want to point out the super job that Representative Smith did to try to guide this bill through (and in the time and coaching he gave us)—even though he was clearly flying in the face of his own party leadership. Also, we much appreciate the co-sponsorship of Senator Sapien—and only wish we could have found a way to get this into the Senate where I think we would have found a much more understanding climate for our dilemma and proposed solution. And we thank Bob Gorrell for his tireless efforts, and those of you who made the effort to go to the statehouse and show the priority we placed on this legislation, as did the many of you who took the time to write to the committee members.

We may be disappointed—but we are not beaten. We will increase our focus on the legal battle and hope to see the judge soon respond to our request for a hearing on our intervention request—and then act on the suit itself. ES-CA and LPT members are continuing to push the NM Environment Department with regard to their investigation of what is happening to the large levels of water and its contaminants after use in the mining operations, as well as pushing for mining area perimeter air quality/small particulate monitoring.

And we are preparing for battle when the BLM issues the Resource Management Plan (RMP) for the Buffalo Tract.

So we hope that all of you will continue to provide the various kinds of support we need to continue to protect the beauty and quality of life that brings us to this wonderful area.

Posted in Current Issues, Zoning and Land Use | 1 Comment

HB188 Local Zoning Enforcement

By Dick Ulmer – HB#188 passed its 1st House committee and will be heard by the 2nd House committee this coming Monday, March 2, 2015 (you can watch for any change in schedule by right clicking here) . As we discovered at the last hearing, if you don’t get there early, you may not get in the room (they only allow the number into the hearing for whom there are seats—otherwise you get to stand in the hall outside until someone leaves). There are two other bills on the docket before HB188 which will likely have supporters (who will leave after testimony—so don’t give up if you are in the hall). We also still expect the opposition to be there to try to dissuade the committee against our bill.

Background on this House committee and a link to key talking points can be found on the ES-CA Forum by right clicking here.

LPT members met on February 2nd with the most vocal opposition. This is a well organized group that supply materials and do road contract work for the state DOT (it was their members that tried to pack the house at the first hearing). We expect that their statements will be consistent with what they told us at the meeting:
1) They are trying to characterize this as all contractors being penalized because of one bad actor. We made it clear, that we are concerned about the next bad act or actor, and are only using our most recent experience as an example.
2) While we pointed out that this was amended to limit to Class A counties—their response was that the state will increase the number of counties that covers and/or next session strike that limitation (they clearly believe that all counties would like this bill to pass)
3) Their most repeated concern was that counties would take advantage of this increased fine to enact local ordinances that would be onerous (e.g. limit mining to 6 hours a day, or truck hauls to 10 a day) in order to drive them out of business (which they contend our proposed fine could do to a small operator which they contend most of the DOT suppliers are).
4) We asked if it would change their position if we added the “20 acres of disturbed land” to further limit applicability and their response is that many of the DOT mines are larger than that, but relatively short lived before being reclaimed. We asked if a larger number (e.g. 50 acres—which would exclude 85% of the mines in the entire state) would do it—and they couldn’t arrive at a number and commit to drop opposition.
5) We pointed out that without local regulations, other than for air quality, we would have none. The state has no noise enforcement, no reclamation enforcement, no evaluation process for impact on surrounding properties, etc—since gravel mining is not mining and gravel is not a mineral according to the state (sounds wrong to me as well). We can either focus on fixing the issue of control from the Roundhouse or local control—or no control (and I don’t think these groups want to be advocating the latter).

Finally, we think their concerns (which seems to be their bottom line position) about local ordinances being enacted using the “teeth” of HB188 to drive them out of business is just wrong. No county wants their roads in a state of disrepair because the cost of gravel went up too much. Homebuyers don’t want the cost of building to skyrocket due to lack of concrete. Local is the right place to make these tradeoffs and decision—not something to be feared.

The hearing on Monday March 2nd could be a difficult vote for us based on the discussions that several of us had last week with committee members—so we need your support. And if you can’t be there, you still have time to email the representatives.

Posted in Uncategorized, Zoning and Land Use | Leave a comment

HELP PUSH FOR HB188!

By Dick Ulmer.  HB188—to give our county some “teeth” in dealing with current and future gravel mining operators, has moved to its second committee and we need to let the committee members know how we feel.  Several of us (ES-CA President Bob Gorrell, and LPT Board members Dick Ulmer, Bob Byrd, Steve Vaughan) were in Santa Fe last week and visited individually with committee members, lobbyists, and other influencers.  Opposition from contractors and gravel operators is being loudly voiced—so we need to make sure we are heard.

Legislators need and want to hear from you.  Attached is the list of committee members that we need you to contact.  Also, we have provided a set of talking points that you should be able to copy and paste into your messages to them.  Click link to open 22Feb2015_CONTACT REPRESENTATIVES TO SUPPORT HB 188.

We will also send out an “all hands on deck” alert when this bill gets scheduled for a hearing in this committee so that any of you who can attend will be able to help us to further show we are serious about this.

Thank you for your help!

Posted in Current Issues, Zoning and Land Use | 1 Comment

Gravel Mining Issues 2/16/2015 Update

By Marsha Marsden: The Eastern Sandoval Citizens Association (ES-CA) is focused on protecting our community. The previous Forum article by Dick Ulmer explains the the outcome of the initial legislative hearing last Friday, February 13, 2015, regarding sand and gravel mining here in Placitas.

The major operation in Placitas is the Vulcan mine formerly the LaFarge mine. At the state house there were two bills introduced on February 13, 2015. The first HB#188 was presented to the House Regulatory and Public Affairs committee to change the penalty levels and fines for violations in the current law as written. At this hearing there were mining outfits from around the state that were in attendance as well as quite a few local Placitas residents. The result of that hearing voted in our favor to send HB 188 to the next level .

The next bill to be heard is HB#190. The bill proposes to have sand and gravel mining over 20 acres placed in to the same category as traditional mining. The rules and regulations under the New Mexico Mining Act require responsible mining including reclaimation. When this bill comes up for hearing the mining interest will be there in force. It is possible that this hearing will happen either this week or next.

Also pending, in the near future will be BLM’s plan to sell off /modify the existing “Buffalo Tract” parcel. At present there are 3 proposals that have been presented to BLM (Santa Ana Pueblo, San Felipe Pueblo and one from the Las Huertas Land Grant Families here in Placitas.) We are concerned about new mining operations starting up in the Buffalo Tract. As you know, once they start stripping off land for mining or other activities it is very difficult to change the course of direction. The mining operations as we understand it, have been speaking with BLM on regards to gaining additional mining land from the Buffalo tract.

We hope that you will join us. This is our home, our community, we need to safeguard it.

Posted in Partner Post, Zoning and Land Use | Leave a comment

Gravel Mining Legislation February 13, 2015

By Dick Ulmer – Today, 2/13, the House Regulatory and Public Affairs Committee (HRPAC) met to consider HB188 and HB190 sponsored by Sen John Sapien and Rep Jim Smith. A more detailed explanation of these bills can be found in the earlier postings on this Forum, but for completeness of this article, we will simply say that HB188 gives counties the right to fine gravel operators up to $1000/violation/day instead of the current $300, and HB190 would place gravel operators under the NM Mining Act which requires reclamation as well as other business responsible conditions.

In an opening “parliamentary move,” requested by Rep Smith (also a member of the HRPAC committee), HB190 was “rolled over” for later consideration by the committee. This was felt necessary due a significant amount of late breaking misinformation from opposing factions that we felt was would be damaging to committee passage—but if we bought a few additional days we could correct and even turn things to our advantage.

The committee room was packed to overflowing and some of our supporters had to remain outside until seats opened up—and we must be doing something right, because while a significant number of our neighbors drove up for the meeting, the opposition—gravel miners from all over the state—were there to object.

Rep Smith and Sen Sapien then summarized HB188 and their support for it. HB188 has been amended to limit to Class A Counties and which there are only about 19 mines affected (Class A County mines 20 acres or more).  Dick Ulmer, our Land Protection Trust chairperson, was introduced as an “expert witness” and presented why this was important and necessary legislation to protect the health and welfare of our community. Following this testimony, the objectors were each given the opportunity to state their objection followed by statements from each of the supporters in the room.

One could not help but be proud of each member of our community who participated with their presence and those who chose to provide public comment. One of the committee members (whose vote we were not sure of) specifically commented about the level of support shown by the citizens of the community. In contrast to many comments by objectors which were based on lack of understanding or fact, those supporting the bills stayed focused on the issues at hand and made brief, but well reasoned statements to the committee members. In addition (and due to a lot of hard work over the weeks leading up to the meeting), compelling statements of support were made by Larry Horan, Sandoval County lobbyist, and Steve Koppleman from the NM Association of Counties.

At the conclusion of comments, the Chair called for a vote and HB 188 was approved by a vote of 3 to 2. While it was a narrow win, from the comments made by the opposition we learned a lot and have a much improved understanding of what we have to do in support of HB 190 which may come up for vote as early as next week.

Getting legislation passed in our State is not easy—but it is good to see the level of vetting that is done before enacting new laws and regulations. With the win HB188 today, we have only taken the first step. We now need to get HB190 passed by the HRPAC and then both bills must go to Energy, Environment and Natural Resouces Committee (HEENC). HEENC is Chaired by Rep. Stickler, a petroleum landman, and will a tough vetting so we will need our facts fully developed and community members attending in support. If the bills get through HEENC, the will then to the House Floor for vote. If they pass the floor, they will then go to the Senate side for similar committees vetting. These activities may also begin this coming week.

The pace and intensity is increasing. We’re off to a good start thanks to the efforts of many in this community—our thanks to each one of you!

Posted in Current Issues, Uncategorized, Zoning and Land Use | 4 Comments

What Legislators Want to Know

Many have asked how they can inform their Legislators of the importance of ES-CA’s responsible gravel mining legislation. Write them, go visit with them, and tell them in committee. The first committee hearing is this Friday, 2/13/15 with the House Regulatory and Public Affairs Committee or HRPAC (see Forum article “Legislation Needs Your Help”). Legislative committee members can be found by going to nmlegis.gov and then click on the tab for Standing Committees.  Opening this link will also take you to contact information for the HRPAC members.

E-mail is a good venue for written communication and the total number of letters, especially unique not form letters, is important.  Then it is important for in-person one-on-one lobbying with legislative members, and then finally, attending committee hearings is very important. Legislators want to know what gravel mining is doing to you and your neighbors.

We need to communicate to our legislators that:
1) We are not trying to stop all gravel mining (the majority of NM mines are less than 20 acres) — just the big ones that seem to feel they can abuse and ignore the communities that surround them and only need to satisfy their stockholders.
2) No substantial increases in development or highway costs can be justified, contrary to what these mines would have you believe, as most of the mines in this state are less than 20 acres in size — and would not be affected by this legislation (assuming, as we have agreed, that HB190 is so amended).
3) This is not simply an “enforcement issue” solvable with existing law–those agencies who currently issue permits to these mines are limited in scope and cannot provide the needed protection.

We in Placitas are seeing the issues of large-scale gravel mining as a result of the Lafarge (now Vulcan) mine. Vulcan has disturbed over 400 acres of land and has not  reclaimed any of it — all of which NM winds whip into our neighborhoods. Sandoval County has charged Lafarge with multiple violations which continue to be ignored while Lafarge forces it into the courts for meaningful resolution.

HB188 (Zoning Enforcement Law):
1) The current law is ambiguous — Sandoval County’s Attorney reads the max fine to be $300. Bernalillo County interprets it as $300 per violation per day.
2) At Lafarge’s 2013 reported transport tonnage levels, estimated revenues are $20K per day (averaged over 365 days per year) — even with Bernalillo County interpretation, fines are not sufficient to be a deterrent.
3) We need to level the playing field between deep-pocketed mining operations and tax-payer funded counties. We’re not trying to stop gravel mining — just protect our citizens.

HB190 (Certain Sand & Gravel under NM Mining Act):
Due to the current exclusion from the mining act, the only state permitting agency is NM Environment Department (NMED). NMED has charged Lafarge with multiple violations of the Air Quality requirements, but does not have sufficient statutory authority to provide the protection our citizens need and deserve.
1) NMED has no authority to require and enforce reclamation (as noted above, a major cause of both fugitive dust and reduced property values in Placitas) including requiring appropriate financial assurances — the Mining Act has this power.
2) The Mining Act limits the duration of mining permits and requires periodic re-justification with public hearings to ensure that the communities around the mine are not being improperly impacted — NMED does not.
3) The Mining Act permits require background checks on mining operators including compliance history at all mines operating now and in the past — NMED does not.
4) The Mining Act permitting process requires a more extensive analysis of the hydrological consequence (e.g. leaching, impact to aquifers, etc) than NMED. Lafarge used 94M gallons of precious water during the drought in 2013 (2-3x residential use levels) from a high arsenic source and the holding ponds leach back into our aquifer or into our air.

Posted in Current Issues, Zoning and Land Use | Leave a comment

Legislation Needs Your Help

This Friday, February 13, ES-CA’s Bills HB188 and HB190 co-sponsored by Rep. Smith and Sen. Sapien will be heard in Santa Fe at 1:30PM in room 315 of the State Capital. If responsible gravel mining is important to you, please attend or at the very least, contact the members of the committee and let them know how you feel (see ES-CA Forum “What Legislators Want to Know”). This first hearing is in the House Regulatory and Public Affairs Committee (HRPAC). For the two responsible gravel mining bills to pass, we must convince HRPAC, then three other committees, the full House, and the full Senate that these Bills are important to the public and must pass.

Anyone wishing to carpool up to the hearing in Santa Fe should arrive at the MERC around 11:45PM this Friday to leave at noon. If you drive or ride the train up on your own, consider coming early to watching the House and Senate debate passage of bills.

You can read these bills by following these links HB188 and  HB190. The bills were formed by ES-CA in response to ongoing concerns of our Eastern Sandoval County citizens and ES-CA members, drafted into potential law by Representative Smith, and then co-sponsored by Senator Sapien. HB188 increases potential penalties for sand and gravel violations of county zoning ordinances. HB190 requires very large scale sand and gravel mines to meet the more cohesive requirements of the Mining Act from which they are currently excluded.

This is not just a localized issue. Some of the most beautiful areas of the state have large gravel deposits. While we use the Lafarge Pit as the current example, we are anticipating that the BLM will soon act to permit gravel mining on 2 sections of land (800 acres) also in the Placitas area — so we repeat: we are asking for our citizens to be protected from the negative impacts these mines have to our air, our water, and the value of our properties, and believe these bills to be tools we need.

Posted in Current Issues, Zoning and Land Use | 2 Comments

ES-CA Board Meeting of February 2, 2015

The ES-CA Board of Directors met on February 2, 2015. All Board members were present (P- Bob Gorrell, VP – Ed Majka, Treasurer – Susan Fullas, Secretary – Lynn Koch, and members – Jerry Saxton, Chris Daul and Tony Hull).

Dick Ulmer, head of the Land Use Planning Trust, spoke about the status of the litigation with Vulcan. ES-CA has petitioned the court to intervene and is still waiting for the judge to rule. The LPT is continuing to raise funds for litigation costs. Bob noted that two pieces of legislation have been introduced in the State Legislature. One would include sand and gravel mining within the purview of the current State Mining Act and the other would strengthen the counties’ ability to enforce their zoning laws. The current litigation with Vulcan arises from Sandoval County’s attempt at enforcing its zoning law and ES-CA’s position is that the County needs stronger authority in these matters.

Jerry Saxton reported that he and the membership committee have been working to improve communications with members and to update the data base. This will also help in keeping members apprised of when their renewals occur. The Board had previously retained an IT firm to assist in this matter, as well as assisting in updating the web page. The Board will continue to use the IT firm on other matters.

The Board reviewed the Rules of Engagement and some changes have been approved. The final document will be posted in the Forum and members are encouraged to share their thoughts about the document.

The next Board meeting is scheduled for Monday, March 2, 2015, beginning at 6:30 pm at la Puerta Realty, located on Rt. 165. All are welcome to attend. The next Political/Legal Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, February 9, beginning at 6:30 pm at the Placitas Library. All are welcome to attend.

As always, the Board welcomes members’ comments and participation.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Town of Bernalillo Annexes Fisher Site

Last Monday 1/12/15, the Town of Bernalillo Town Council approved Ordinance 286 annexing the Fisher Sand and Gravel site into the Town borders. They provided an M-1 Zoning designation with a conditional permit allowing mining of sand and gravel for a period of 7 years. Fisher in return will donate 7 acres of land for ESCAFCA to build a detention pond to provide additional flood control for the Town. Fisher will also provide excavation for that portion of the property. Upon completion of the removal of all saleable material or 7 years whichever comes first, Fisher will reclaim the site for commercial development and are required to provide a performance bond to ensure completion within 1 additional year.

Although ESCA did not accomplish all the recommendations submitted to all parties involved, we did establish an end date and many of our requests were incorporated into the Ordinance. The original application by Fisher had no end date. We were able to negotiate from 15 years to 7 years but could not get the permit to 5 years. Hours of operation as per our request are 7am-5pm Monday-Friday, no possibility of an asphalt plant, metering of water usage, adequate performance bonding and several other concerns which we will continue to follow to ensure compliance.

It is important to stay on top off the operation to make sure they follow the conditions of the temporary permit. Hopefully, our efforts will also be a precedent for any future mining activity in our community. ESCA is continuing its work to put more stringent Governmental regulations regarding zoning and mining in place and is working closely with our Political Representatives at the County and State levels.We must all be vigilant and active to protect our Community. As we proceed ,we will keep you informed.

Posted in Current Issues, Partner Post, Uncategorized | Leave a comment